RAMOTAR YOGI S/O OF SHRI BODAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/13431/2025 · 2025-11-14
Sanjeet Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38013 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38013 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45863] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13431/2025 Ramotar Yogi S/o Of Shri Bodan Lal, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Bhopar Tappa, Tehsil Mahwa, Distrct Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Dy. Secretary Administration,
Revenue
(Group-3)
Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. District Collector, District Dausa (Raj.)
3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa (Raj.)
4. Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Mahwa, District Dausa (Raj.)
5. S.h.o. , Police Station Mahwa, Distrcit Dausa (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sharda Bai Gurjar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order 14/11/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits on a representation made by the petitioner that illegal construction is being made by some of the villagers, Sub-Divisional Officer, Mahwa vide its order dated 25.02.2025 has directed the Tehsildar Mahwa, to take appropriate action.
2. As per the note appended by the said order, the Tehsildar Mahwa, has further issued a direction to the Land Revenue Inspector, Rasidpur, concerned Patwari and SHO, P.S. Mahwa, to take appropriate action on such legal construction.
[2025:RJ-JP:45863] (2 of 2) [CW-13431/2025]
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of the same, no effective action has been taken and the encroachers are raising construction on the same.
4. In these circumstances, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the Sub Divisional Officer, Mahwa. It is directed that Sub Divisional Officer Mahwa, take effective action on the representation so submitted by the petitioner after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner by a speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.
5. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J PAYAL DHAWAN /16