Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38009 (RAJ)

INDIRA D/O SHRI CHHOGA RAM BANJARA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMA/569/2023 · 2025-07-04

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24702] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 569/2023 IN S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.1052/2023 Indira D/o Shri Chhoga Ram Banjara aged about 23 Years, R/o 87, Shivanandpuri, Mahapura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Applicant-Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City (West), government Hostel Building, M.i. Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 5. Puran S/o Thanaram, R/o Village Chakwada, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan.) 6. Vishnu S/o Thanaram, R/o Village Chakwada, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan.) 7. Dularam S/o Thanaram, R/o Village Chakwada, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan.) 8. Darbar S/o Thanaram, R/o Village Chakwada, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan.) 9. Mahendra S/o Vishnu, R/o Village Chakwada, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan.) 10. Angrej S/o Vishnu, R/o Village Chakwada, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan.) 11. Prem W/o Vishnu, R/o Village Chakwada, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan.) 12. Rukma W/o Durlaram, R/o Village Chakwada, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan.) ----Non-petitioners/Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:24702] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-569/2023] For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Madhu Meena on behalf of Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 04/07/2025 Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present criminal miscellaneous application has become infructuous. In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed as having become infructuous. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/15