[2025: RJ-JP:42189] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15815/2025 Bhoop Singh S/o Ram Ji Lal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 453, Ganesh Vihar Main Road Jhotwara, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Transport Commissioner, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. The Secretary (R.T.O.), Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur Region, Jaipur. 3. District Transport Officer, Jaipur, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) 4. District Transport Officer, Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghuraj Singh Rajawat, Adv. with Mr. Sanju Rathore, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 15/10/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: - “It is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to accept this writ petition and direct the Respondents to take time bound action against the illegal operation of the vehicles (mentioned in the para no.3 of the writ petition) and to ensure that no unauthorized vehicle is plied without time table on the notified route Jaipur to Shahjhapur, Behror and Alwar.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation dated 09.09.2025 before the respondents, but no action has yet been taken to decide the same. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents, who, despite several [2025: RJ-JP:42189] (2 of 2) [CW-15815/2025] representations made by the petitioner, have failed to take any steps against the persons plying their vehicles in an unauthorized manner on the routes from Jaipur to Shahjahapur, Behror, Alwar, and other joint routes. Further, learned counsel places reliance upon the judgments passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10046/2017 titled as Chotu Ram Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10185/2023 titled as Bhoop Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 3. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Court, while relying upon the dictum enunciated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. CWP No. 1665/2024), directs the respondents to adjudicate the representation/legal notice dated 09.09.2025 (Annexure-A-2) filed by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law and on merits, by passing a speaking order within a period of one week. 4. Further, respondents are directed that if any representation is filed by the citizen or concerned person qua their grievances, the same shall be adjudicated and decided within a reasonable period of time, in accordance with the mandate laid down in Pawan Meena (Supra). It is made clear that failure to comply with the aforesaid direction shall entail the imposition of appropriate costs upon the concerned competent authority, which shall be recovered from the salary of the said authority 5. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /35