SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 2159 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Siddharth Bankoti, learned legal aid counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant “Dhananajay Yadav, son of Ramsarisha Yadav” is seeking regular bail in relation to FIR dated 07.07.2021 bearing FIR No. 23 of 2021, Police Station – Hindolakhal, District – Tehri Garhwal wherein four persons namely Karan Singhania, Vivek Rai, Kamlesh and Raju Patel were implicated for the offence punishable under Sections 420 IPC. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the present applicant for the offences punishable under Section 419, 420, 120B IPC and under Section 66D of the IT Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge sheet has been filed and trial has already commenced and uptil date, five prosecution witnesses have been examined and they have not supported the prosecution case and applicant is languishing in jail since 05.02.2025. He claims parity of the other co-accused Nitesh Kumar, who was granted bail by this court on 25.09.2025. 5. On the other side, learned State counsel have not disputed this fact that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 05.02.2025 and the applicant deserves the benefit of parity of the other co-accused Nitesh Kumar. 6. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the applicant is languishing in jail since 05.02.2025 in the present case and trial has already commenced, therefore, there is no need of the custodial interrogation of the present applicant, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant “Dhananjay Yadav, son of Ramsarisha Yadav” be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that after being released on bail, applicant shall join the trial proceedings on each and every date and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, failing which the trial court shall be at liberty to take appropriate legal action against the applicant. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 10.01.2026 PR