Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37997 (PNJ)

VINEET PANNU v. STATE OF HARYANAAND OTHERS

CWP/8308/2025 · 2025-03-24

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-8308-2025 (O&M). -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 120 CWP-8308-2025 (O&M). Date of Decision: 24.03.2025. VINEET PANNU ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Mr. Govind Mor, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) The instant writ petition has been filed for seeking an issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the salary of the petitioner from the date of his joining along with interest @ 9% per annum. A further prayer has been made for directing the respondents to consider the Sports Gradation Certificate issued to the petitioner. 2 Notice of motion. 3 Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4 Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present petition can be disposed of in terms of the order dated 14.01.2025 passed in RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.03.24 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8308-2025 (O&M). -2- CWP-34718-2024 titled as ‘Chandrawati Vs. State of Haryana and others’ and CWP-35103-2024 titled as ‘Savita Kumari Vs. State of Haryana and others.’ 5 Disposed of in terms of order dated 14.01.2025 passed in CWP- 34718-2024 titled as ‘Chandrawati Vs. State of Haryana and others’ and CWP-35103-2024 titled as ‘Savita Kumari Vs. State of Haryana and others.’ March 24, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.03.24 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document