NIC Ltd. Vs. Debo & ors. CMPs No.28287 to 28290 & 30103 of 2025 in FAO No.26 of 2013 18.12.2025 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the non-applicant/ appellant. Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicants/ respondents No.1 to 4. CMPs No.28287 & 28288 2025 The instant applications under Order 32, Rule 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) have been filed by the applicants/respondent No.3 and 4, for discharging their natural guardian/mother Debo, i.e. respondent No.1, as they have attained the age of majority. 2. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the applications, which are duly supported with affidavits of the applicants/respondent No.3 and 4 as well as taking into consideration the fact that they have now attained the age of majority, as is evident from their respective Matriculation certificates, annexed with the applications, the same are allowed and their natural guardian/mother Debo, i.e. respondent No.1, is ordered to be discharged from their guardianship and the applicants/respondent No.3 & 4 are permitted to pursue the case in their own capacity. 3. The applications stand disposed of. CMPs No. 28289 & 30103 of 2025 4. The present applications under Section 151 of CPC have been maintained by the applicants/respondent No.3 & 4, namely, Rishu & Sandeep, respectively, for release of the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The applications are duly supported with the affidavits of applicants/ respondents No.3 and 4. 5. As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money to meet out their day-to-day expenses, including food, clothing, education etc. Therefore, it is prayed that the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest be released in their favour, as per their respective shares. 6. No reply(ies) is/are intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicant/appellant and the learned counsel for the non- applicant/appellant has no objection in case the prayer(s) made in the applications is/are allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 16.07.2025, passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. 7. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the applications, which are duly supported with affidavits of the applicants/respondents No.3 & 4, coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the entire awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest in favour of applicants/respondents No. 3 & 4, as per their respective shares in the total awarded amount of compensation, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, after proper verification and identification by remitting the same to their respective bank accounts, details whereof have been given in para-4 of the applications. The applications stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge December 18, 2025 (V.Himalvi)