Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37987 (AP)

BUDDIGA PRADEEP v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/10060/2022 · 2025-02-11

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010686082022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10060/2022 Between: Buddiga Pradeep and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. MEKALA ANUSHA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10060/2022 ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 1 to 3, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against them in CC.No.2551 of 2020 on the file of IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Rajamahendravaram. 2. Heard Sri B.V.Rama Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Ms. M. Anusha, learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners, by dispensing the presence of the petitioners/A2 and A3 before the Trial Court. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal petition is disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners. However, the presence of the petitioners/A2 and A3 before the Trial Court is dispensed with unless their presence is specifically directed by the Trial Court. 3 However, the petitioners are at liberty to raise all the contentions before the Trial Court in their defence. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 11.02.2025 UPS 4 16 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.10060 of 2022 Dt.11.02.2025 UPS