IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27359 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2024 Thana- MEDNI CHAUKI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Jogi Sada @ Yogendra Sada S/o- Tishan Sada @ Tiso Sada R/village - Abgil Rampur, P.S - Mednichouki, Dist. - Lakhisarai 2. Safindra Sada @ Sofen Sada @ Sofendra Sada S/o- Tishan Sada @ Tiso Sada R/village - Abgil Rampur, P.S - Mednichouki, Dist. - Lakhisarai 3. Arun Sada S/o- Opee SAda @ Biranchi Sada R/village - Abgil Rampur, P.S - Mednichouki, Dist. - Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 07-05-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 76, 109, 352, 351(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, informant, namely Nunubati Devi, alleged that on 30.12.2024 at about 8:30 AM, while she was constructing her house, in the meantime, all these petitioners came there armed with iron rod and lathi and abused and assaulted informant and her family members and also tried to outrage her modesty. It is further alleged that Petitioner Nos. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27359 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/3 1 and 2 hit on head of son and husband of informant by means of iron rod. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Both parties are co-villagers and due to land dispute, a simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they assaulted informant and her family members. Injuries, allegedly caused by Petitioner No. 1, has been found to be grievous in nature. 6. Considering the specific and direct nature of accusation and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to Petitioner No. 2 is rejected. 7. So far as Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 are concerned, considering the nature of accusation, nature of injuries cause by them, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27359 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 3/3 anticipatory bail to Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 is allowed. 8. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail- bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st, Lakhisarai in connection with Mednichouki P.S. Case No. 291 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. 9. With the aforesaid directions, this application stands disposed of. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T