Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3798 (CHH)

Jan Kalyan Khadi Gramodyog Ashram, Chhuri v. Khadi and Village Industries Commission

WPC/1591/2015 · 2025-01-15

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:2620 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1591 of 2015 1 - Jan Kalyan Khadi Gramodyog Ashram, Chhuri District Korba Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Jivrakhan Lal Dewangan, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Chhuri, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Khadi And Village Industries Commission Irla Road, Vile Parle West, Mumbai 400056, Maharashtra, Through Its Chairman., Maharashtra 2 - Financial Advisor, Kahdi And Village Industries Commission, Irla Road, Vile Parle West, Mumbai- 400056 Maharashtra, District : Mumbai, Maharashtra 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Khadi And Village Industries Commission, Irla Road, Vile Parle West, Mumbai- 400056 Maharashtra , District : Mumbai, Maharashtra 4 - Director, Directorate Of Audit, Khadi And Village Industries Commission, Irla Road, Vile Parle West, Mumbai- 400056 Maharashtra , District : Mumbai, Maharashtra 5 - Director , Khadi And Village Industries Commission, Ministry Of M S M E, Government Of India, State Office 2/15, Dani House, Govind Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Shri P. Nallamuthu, Assistant Director, Khadi And Village Industries Commission, Madurai Tamil Nadu, District : Madurai, Tamil Nadu ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Vedant Sadangi, Advocate. For State : Mr. Aniket Verma on behalf of Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate. NISHA DUBEY Digitally signed by NISHA DUBEY 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 15/01/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ petition subsequent developments have taken place and pursuant thereto petitioner has filed a new writ petition bearing Writ Petition(Civil) No.2200 of 2024. 2. In view of change in circumstances, petitioner does not want to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for respondent does not object to the above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Nisha