Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37973 (AP)

T.Suryanarayana v. The Indian Oil Corporation Limited,rep.by its Chairman

WP/7791/2010 · 2025-08-17

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010679972010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7791/2010 Between: 1. T.SURYANARAYANA, S/O.HANUMANTU PROPRIETOR M/S.SRI SANJEEVARAYA TRANSPORT FLAT NO.201,"B" BLOCK , ROYHAL TOWERS, NEAR NETAJI TALKIES,KURNOOL ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN, AND MANAGING DIRECTOR G-9,ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG,BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI,MAHARASHTRA STATE 2. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER TIRUPATI, DIVISIONAL OFFICE,INDIAN OIL CORPORATION D.NO.8-115/1, 1ST FLOOR, M.M.COMPLEX, R.C.ROAD ROYAL NAGAR, TIRUPATI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the action of the respondent-corporation contained in letter No.TDO/KNL/01 dated12.3.2010 terminating the petrol /HSD pump agreement of the petitioner dated 1.4.2009 of the petitioner relating to the Swagath Retail Outlet, Kurnool Town and District by the petitioner as arbitrary, and illegal, and consequently set aside the same and direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as job contractor in respect of the said retail outlet for the full period as provided by the said agreement dated 1.4.2009 i.e. up to 31.3.2013 enabling the petitioner to run said retail outlet as per the terms and conditions 2 contained therein and grant such other relief as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 10012 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation and effect of the letter of the 2nd respondent bearing No.TDO/KNL/01 dated 12.3.2010 terminating the petrol/HSD pump agreement of the petitioner dated 1.4.2009 in respect of the Swagat Retail Outlet, Kurnool, pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2010(WPMP 16347 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the petitioner to amend the writ affidavit by introducing para No 15(a) and introducing an additional prayer for a writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents contained in the letter dt.01-06-2010 appointing an ad hoc Dealer for Swagath Retail Outlet is arbitrary and illegal, and grant such other relief IA NO: 3 OF 2010(WPMP 16348 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of and effect of the letter of the 2nd respondent in reference NO TDO/KNL/01 dt 01-6-2010 pending disposal of the wp Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M BALANAGA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAI SANJAY SURANENI 2. DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 18.08.2025 KAS