Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:55257 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10242 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shatrujeet Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepankar Chaudhary,Prakesh Kumar Yadav,Shivam Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief :
"to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent no.2 & 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 21.12.2024 (Annexure No.1)."
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in view of the judgments passed by this Court in case of Jahar Singh v. State of U.P. reported in 2017(4) ADJ 619 as well as in Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ
226.
4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 67 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall be decided after hearing all the concerned parties in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad