Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3797 (KAR)

SMT. SUSHILA TUKARAM KALE v. SRI. MARUTI TUKARAM CHAVAN

WP/107764/2018 · 2025-03-26

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5583 WP No. 107764 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 107764 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUSHILA TUKARAM KALE, AGED ABOUT: 70 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD AND AGRICULTURE, R/O: HADNAL, TQ: CHIKODI. 2. SMT. YASHODA NIVRUTI NIRMALE, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD AND AGRICULTURE, R/O: DATTWAD, TQ: SHIROL, DIST: SANGALI. 3. SMT. SHAKUNTALA ANNA VAKUSHE, AGED ABOUT: 64 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD AND AGRICULTURE, R/O: SOUNDALGA, TQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUNIL KHOT., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAMACHANDRA.A.MALI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. MARUTI TUKARAM CHAVAN, AGED: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 2. SRI. MALLU TUKARAM CHAVAN, AGED: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 3. SRI. SADASHIV TUKARAM CHAVAN, AGED: 55 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5583 WP No. 107764 of 2018 4. SRI. PANDURANG TUKARAM CHAVAN, AGED: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 5. SMT. RATNABAI MAHADEV CHAVAN, AGED: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, ALL R/O: ADI VILLAGE, TQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI. … RESPONDENTS (R1 & 5-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; R2-4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOT YET RECEIVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Sunil Khot., counsel on behalf of Sri.Ramachandra A.Mali., for the petitioners has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.Sunil Khot., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the Advocate on record and the petitioners about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5583 WP No. 107764 of 2018 The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30