Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3797 (CHH)

Aaram Das Vaishanav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPS/6657/2017 · 2025-07-08

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:31626 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6657 of 2017 Aaram Das Vaishanav S/o Shri Munshi Das Vaishanav Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Ghutiya Post Mahant Police Station And Tahsil Navagarh District Janjgir Chhampa Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan New Mantralaya Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh. , Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector, Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. , District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Sabyasachi Bhaduri, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 09.07.2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner, who was working on the post of Data Entry Operator on daily wages w.e.f. 03.08.2011, was suddenly terminated from service on 08.08.2017, against which, he has preferred representation (Annexure-P/04) before the respondent No.03, but the same has not been decided till date. 3. Be that as it may, this petition is disposed of by directing the SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Date: 2025.07.10 10:39:46 +0530 2 respondent No.03 to consider and decide petitioner’s pending representation (Annexure-P/04) in accordance with law by passing reasoned and speaking order within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if