Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37966 (CHH)

BHOJRAJ SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9162/2025 · 2025-08-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40300 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9162 of 2025 1 - Bhojraj Sahu S/o Nirbhay Ram Sahu Aged About 34 Years Teacher (Lb) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Boys Naya Bazar Rajhara, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh 2 - Yogendra Nath Dewangan S/o Pooran Lal Dewangan Aged About 34 Years Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Boys Naya Bazar Dalli Rajhara (Sages), Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh 3 - Narayan Rana S/o Dhanwa Ram Rana Aged About 37 Years Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt. Girl Middle School Kusumkasa, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh 4 - Tarachand Nisad S/o Krishna Kumar Nisad Aged About 47 Years Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt. Boys Middle School Naya Bazar Rajhara (Sages), Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh 5 - Devashri Shrivastava S/o Sameer Kumar Shrivastava Aged About 41 Years Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt. Boys Middle School Naya Bazar Rajhara, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh 6 - Dilshwari Rawte W/o Davender Singh Rawte Aged About 37 Years Upper Division Teacher And Posted At Govt. Middle School Bhimpuri Snkul Bhimpuri, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh 7 - Keshu Ram Thakur S/o Dayalu Ram Thakur Aged About 41 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Bhimpuri, Block Dondi Lohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh 8 - Alka Thakur W/o Ramdin Thakur Aged About 48 Years Working As Head Master Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 And Posted At Govt. Primary School Aamakatta Sankul Godelwahi, Block Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 9 - Charan Singh Churendra S/o Harishchandra Churendra Aged About 34 Years Assistant Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Salhe Sankul Ragho Nawagaon, Block Dond Loharai, District Balod Chhattisgarh 10 - Davinder Singh Rawte S/o Mannu Lal Rawte Aged About 46 Years Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Madwpathra Sankul Ranna Khojji, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Panchayat And Social Welfare Department, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Balod District Balod Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 6 - District Education Officer Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Addl. Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 11-08-2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction towards the respondent authorities for grant of Krmonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order dated 28-02-2024 passed by the Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 and also as per circular dated 10-03-2017 issued by the State Government of C.G. 3 2. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023, has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make their representation to the competent authority in light of order dated 28/02/2024 passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5. Against the order passed in WA No.261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court bearing SLP(C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17-03-2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make their representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation(s) being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such 4 representation(s). It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil