[2025:RJ-JP:39286] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12058/2025 1. Heeralal Meghwal S/o Bajranglal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dubliya Police Station Sunel District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) 2. Awdesh Khatik S/o Rameshchand, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dubliya Police Station Sunel District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 23/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Heeralal Meghwal S/o Bajranglal and Awdesh Khatik S/o Rameshchand seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.170/2025 dated 02.09.2025 registered at P.S. Sunel District - Jhalawar, for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 119(1) and 3(5) of BNS. 2. During course of argument, learned counsel for petitioner offers to withdraw bail application of Awdesh with liberty to file after filing of charge-sheet. [2025:RJ-JP:39286] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-12058/2025] 3. Having considered the submissions, bail application of Awdesh is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Now we are considering bail application of Heeralal Meghwal. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that role and involvement of present petitioner is not established from the evidence on record. He further submitted that complainant instead of returning money has filed a false case. He also submitted that no recovery is effected from present petitioner. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station. 7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 8. On the basis of complaint lodged by complainant Durgalal on 02.09.2025 about intimidation and extortion a report is registered and matter is investigated. The petitioner is [2025:RJ-JP:39286] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-12058/2025] arrested and investigation is in progress. There is no criminal antecedents against petitioner Heerala Meghwal. 9. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 10. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Heeralal Meghwal s/o Bajranglal, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. [2025:RJ-JP:39286] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-12058/2025] 11. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /184