Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37962 (BOM)

SACHIN JAISINGRAO JADHAV v. CHANDRAKANT MAHADEO JADHAV AND ANR.

APEAL/377/2006 · 2025-10-10

Shri Shivkumar Dige

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

121-APEAL-377-2006 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 377 OF 2006 Sachin Jaisingrao Jadhav …. Appellant Versus Chandrakant Mahadeo Jadhav And Anr. …. Respondents ----- None for for the Appellant. Mr. Pradeep Yadav, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. N. B. Patil, A.P.P., for the Respondent – State. Mr. Chandrakant Jadhav, Respondent No.1 – in person, present. ----- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 10th OCTOBER, 2025. P.C. : 1. None present for the Appellant. Heard learned counsel for the Respondent No.1 and learned APP for the Respondent - State. 2 In view of the judgment Hon’ble Apex Court in the case Celestium Financial Vs. Ghanasekaran Etc. (2005) SC 2099 liberty to the Applicant to file appeal before the learned Sessions Court. 3. In view of above, the Application is dismissed and disposed off. 4. Learned Sessions Court shall consider the delay, if appeal is filed as application was pending before this Court. ( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/1 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2025.10.14 12:31:56 +0530