IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 RSA-3467-1999 Date of Decision:26.05.2025 RAM DUTT ...APPELLANT VERSUS RAMSARUP & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate and Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Counsel for the appellant states that despite repeated letters, appellant has not come forward and he does not have any instructions. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. 2. Dismissed for default in prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to seek revival of the appeal, in case, he intends to pursue the appeal. 26.05.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.05.26 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh