CWP-10133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (205) Amritsar Plywood through its PSPCL and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated 09.05.2018 (Annexure P respondent No.3, as well as, to quash the 30.04.2013 (Annexure P PSPCL, Mall Mandi, Sub Division, Amritsar, licencee. 2. Court, that during the pendency of the instant writ petition, the property, in question, has been taken under the Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short ‘SARFAESI Act’). 10133-2019 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amritsar Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh Versus and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Vir Singh Lehal, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2-PSPCL. Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.3. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated 09.05.2018 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amritsar respondent No.3, as well as, to quash the 30.04.2013 (Annexure P-7), passed by the Assistant Executive Engineer, PSPCL, Mall Mandi, Sub Division, Amritsar, Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, informs this Court, that during the pendency of the instant writ petition, the property, in question, has been taken under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short ‘SARFAESI Act’). 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10133-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.05.2025 partner Sh. Amarjit Singh …Petitioner ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI , Advocate PSPCL. Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated 09.05.2018 1), passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amritsar respondent No.3, as well as, to quash the final assessment order dated 7), passed by the Assistant Executive Engineer, PSPCL, Mall Mandi, Sub Division, Amritsar, respondent No.2-distribution Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, informs this Court, that during the pendency of the instant writ petition, the possession of over by the financial institution, econstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short ‘SARFAESI Act’). Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated 09.05.2018 1), passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amritsar-I, final assessment order dated 7), passed by the Assistant Executive Engineer, distribution Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, informs this the possession of by the financial institution, econstruction of Financial Assets and MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.03 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-10133 3. stage, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty reserve its right to contest the same, in case, the possession of the property, in question, is resumed to the petitioner again. 4. opposed by the learned counsel for the 5. withdrawn, at this stage, with liberty as aforesaid 6. May 02, 2025 Manpreet 10133-2019 (O&M) In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty reserve its right to contest the same, in case, the possession of the property, in question, is resumed to the petitioner again. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent Consequently, the instant writ petition is withdrawn, at this stage, with liberty as aforesaid Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty reserve its right to contest the same, in case, the possession of the property, in question, is resumed to the petitioner again. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not respondent-distribution licencee. Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage, with liberty as aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty to reserve its right to contest the same, in case, the possession of the property, in The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not dismissed as MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.03 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment