Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37948 (RAJ)

SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS

CRLMP/3067/2013 · 2025-10-07

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40687] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3067/2013 Surendera Kumar Jain S/o Shri Dull Chand Jain aged about 48 years, R/o Behind Adarsh Vidhya Mandir, Ward No. 18, Bandikui City, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through PP 2. Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range, Jaipur 4. Superintendent Of Police, Dausa, Rajasthan 5. S.H.O. PS Bandikui, Distt. Dausa 6. Investigation Officer In The F.I.R. Bearing No. 443/2012 Registered At PS Bandikui Distt. Dausa Raj 7. Registrar, Rajasthan Cooperative Department, Nehru Sakhar Bhawan, Jaipur. 8. Chief Administrator, Kraya Vikraya Sahkari Samiti Bandikui Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 07/10/2025 1. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. 2. By way of filing this criminal misc. petition, petitioner has prayed for directions against the Director General of Police, Rajasthan Jaipur to undertake the investigation of the FIR bearing No. 443/2012 registered at Police Station Bandikui, Dist. Dausa and investigate the matter freely and fairly. [2025:RJ-JP:40687] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3067/2013] 3. At the threshold, learned Public Prosecutor has informed this Court that on the basis of factual report dated 02.05.2025 that after completing the investigation, charge-sheet has been filed by the Investigating Officer before the Competent Criminal Court on 17.02.2014. 4. Factual report dated 02.05.2025 is taken on record. 5. In view of above statement made by learned Public Prosecutor on the basis of factual report, no cause of action to pursue the instant misc. petition survives. Hence, the same is dismissed as having become infructuous. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/31