Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37948 (MAD)

M/S.AYAZ FOOTWEAR v. THE BRANCH MANAGER

WP/10810/2025 · 2025-04-23

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.10810 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :23.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.10810 of 2025 M/s. Ayaz Footwear, Represented by its Proprietor, Abdul Basith (aged 51 years) S/o. Abdul Hakkim Address at No.26, Stinger Street, Chennai – 600 108. ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Branch Manager, Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Jeevan Marina, No.46, Armenan Street, Chennai – 600 001. 2. The Police Inspector/SHO, Cyber Economic & Narcotic Crime Police Station East Division, Broadway Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalaore, Karnataka State. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.02.2025 within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Court. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10810 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr. P.Pugalenthi For Respondents : Mr.S.Narendra Moorthy (for R1) No appearance (for R2) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.02.2025 within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Court. 2. Though notice was served on the second respondent and the name is also printed in the cause list, no one appeared on behalf of the second respondent. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record. 4. The petitioner maintained Account No. 1153135000017550 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10810 of 2025 with the first respondent. While that being so, on the request made by the second respondent dated 09.06.2023, the first respondent has frozen the account of the petitioner and did not permit the petitioner to operate his account. 5. On a perusal of the communication dated 09.06.2023, it is revealed that the petitioner's account has been used as a second-layer account by the accused and credited a sum of Rs.75,353/-. Therefore, the first respondent requested to hold a sum of Rs.75,353/- in the petitioner's account. However, now the first respondent has frozen the account of the petitioner and did not permit the petitioner to operate the account. 6. In view of the above, the first respondent is directed to hold a sum of Rs.75,353/-, and permit the petitioner's Account No.1153135000017550 to operate in respect of the remaining amount. 7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10810 of 2025 costs. 23.04.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation/Yes/No kv To 1. The Branch Manager, Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Jeevan Marina, No.46, Armenan Street, Chennai – 600 001. 2. The Police Inspector/SHO, Cyber Economic & Narcotic Crime Police Station East Division, Broadway Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalaore, Karnataka State. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10810 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. kv W.P.No.10810 of 2025 23.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis