Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37947 (BOM)

SHRI. PANDURANG NARAYAN PATIL AND ANR v. SHRI. BALKRISHNA RAMCHANDRA PATIL DECD THRU LHRS AND ORS

WP/8902/2022 · 2025-01-09

Shri Amit Borkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14-wp-8902-2022.doc Shabnoor IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8902 OF 2022 Pandurang Narayan Patil & Anr. … Petitioners V/s. Balkrishna Ramchandra Patil (Deceased) Through Legal Heirs & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Ashutosh M. Kulkarni for petitioners. Mr. Dilip Shinde for respondents. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JANUARY 9, 2025 P.C.: 1. The petitioners are original plaintiffs who filed the suit for specific performance of contract wherein the petitioners filed an application for temporary injunction restraining respondent No.3 from creating third party rights. Both the Courts below have rejected petitioners’ application. At least, since 7th December 2020, there is no injunction in petitioner’s favour. Therefore, at this stage, it is not necessary to interfere with the impugned order. 2. However, it is made clear that the findings recorded by the Courts below nor the observations made in the impugned order shall not bind on the Trial Court while deciding the suit. The Trial 1 SHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN Digitally signed by SHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN Date: 2025.01.09 18:02:06 +0530 14-wp-8902-2022.doc Court shall decide the suit on its own merits uninfluenced by the observations in the impugned judgment and orders passed by the Courts below. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2