Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37947 (AP)

APSRTC, KRISHNA DIST v. KORADA SATYANARAYANA, SRIKAKULAM DIST & ANOTHER

MACMA/2058/2017 · 2025-09-25

Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010672612017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2058/2017 Between: 1. APSRTC, KRISHNA DIST, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR BUS BHAVAN MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. NOW AT VIJAYAWADA ...APPELLANT AND 1. KORADA SATYANARAYANA SRIKAKULAM DIST ANOTHER, S/O VISHNU MURTHY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, KIRANA MERCHANT RESIDENT OF DOOR NO. 1-26, PEDDAKARAGAM VILLAGE MARASANNAPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 2. MUVVALA NAGABHUSANA RAO, S/O LATE DANDASI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, DRIVER OF APSRTC BUS DRIVER AP 29-Z-3623 TEKKALI DEPOT, RESIDENT OF DUVVARAL STREET PATHAPATNAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC praying thet the Highcourt may be pleased toto allow the appeal by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-1 Additional District Judge, Srikakulam passed in M.V.O.P No. 333 OF 2014 dated 09.2.2017 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(MACMAMP 3703 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 condone the delay of 64 days in filing the Appeal against the Judgment and Decree of Chariman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Srikakulam passed in M .V.O.P.No. 333 of 2014 dated 09.02.2017 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(MACMAMP 3704 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to granst stay of execution of Decree passed by Chariman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Srikakulam passed in M .V.O.P.No. 333 of 2014 dated 09.02.2017 pending disposal of the above M.A.C.M.A. No. /2017 and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA 2. KRISHNA RAO M 3 The Court made the following Judgment: Today, when the matter is called, Sri Ch.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Vinod Kumar Taralada, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC/appellant submits that the matter has been settled out of Court as per the instructions of the legal officer and to that effect a Memo, dated 22.09.2025, is filed seeking to withdraw the appeal. 2. Sri Krishna Rao Modhalavalasa, learned counsel for the respondents has reported no objection for the same. 3. Accordingly, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications, pending, if any shall stand closed. _______________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date: 26.09.2025 BMS