[2025:RJ-JP:42215] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15629/2025 Priyanka Sharma W/o Sh. Vinay Kaushik, R/o Ganga Bhihar Colony, Manoharpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 303104 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Jaipur, Secretariat, Rajasthan. 2. Program Director, Maternal Health, National Health Mission, Department Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare, Swasthya Bhawan, A-2 Jamnalal Bajaj Marg, Ashok Nagar, C-Scheme Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 3. Director (Non-Gazette), Department Of Medical And Health Jaipur, Swasthya Bhawan, A-2 Jamnalal Bajaj Marg, Ashok Nagar, C-Scheme Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sumitra Choudhary Mr. Prem Chand Sharma Ms. Sanju Buldak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(i) Issue a writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ order or direction to Respondents to decide the Representation dated 21.05.2025 given by the Petitioner & relive her from the deputation as Trainer and Men-tor, Midwifery Educator at SMTI and rejoin her to the position of Nursing Tutor at SMS College of Nursing, Jaipur immediately; [2025:RJ-JP:42215] (2 of 3) [CW-15629/2025] (ii) May pass any other appropriate order (s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case..” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is facing several challenges and after mentioning them she submitted a representation but same was not decided. She further submits that it is duty of the respondents to adopt balanced approach after considering circumstances as mentioned by the petitioner. She also submitted that till disposal of representation the impugned order be stayed. She further submitted that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate and detailed representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. Learned counsel for respondents has no objection. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:42215] (3 of 3) [CW-15629/2025] 4. In the meanwhile, the impugned order shall be kept in abeyance till disposal of representation. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /182