APHC010675662012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL Between: Sri Viswanadha Venkata Pavan Kumar Sri Shaik Abdul Khader and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A JAYANTHI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: Sri Viswanadha Venkata Pavan Kumar is the claimant and his claim for compensation sustained by him was enquired into by the Tribunal, granted Rs. 55,000/- (Rupees fifty five thousand only). Aggrieved by its, he preferred this Appeal. 2. Today, as well as for the respondent No.2 Insurance Company IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1261 i Viswanadha Venkata Pavan Kumar AND Sri Shaik Abdul Khader and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: Counsel for the Respondent(S): following: Sri Viswanadha Venkata Pavan Kumar is the claimant and his claim for compensation sustained by him was enquired into by the Tribunal, granted (Rupees fifty five thousand only). Aggrieved by its, he preferred Today, as well as on earlier occasions, it is only the for the respondent No.2 Insurance Company has been present. There has IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3365] THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1261 OF 2012 ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT(S) Sri Viswanadha Venkata Pavan Kumar is the claimant and his claim for compensation sustained by him was enquired into by the Tribunal, granted (Rupees fifty five thousand only). Aggrieved by its, he preferred the learned counsel present. There has been no representation for the Appellant. In fact, on the direction of this Court, Registry had addressed a letter to the appellant and it was returned un-served with an endorsement that ‘no such address’. On verifying the records, it is seen that the Registry addressed letters basing on the address printed in the claim as well as in the Appeal. Neither counsel, nor the appellant have been prosecuting the appeal on scores of adjournments. 3. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for Non-Prosecution. No costs. 4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR, J Dated: 06.02.2025 KK THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1261 OF 2012 06.02.2025 KK