[2025:RJ-JP:45352] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13153/2025 Khuma Ram Bajroliya S/o Bhagu Ram Bajroliya, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Dhokliya Post Manglana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Nirmal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 12/11/2025 1. This criminal miscellaneous bail application under Section 482 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner for seeking anticipatory bail in respect of FIR No.209/2025 dated 17.08.2025 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, District Anti Corruption Bureau District under Section 7, 7A & 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no investigation whatsoever has been pending before him and there was no direct conversation between the complainant and accused- petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that recovery of bribe has also not been made from him, however, he has falsely been implicated and in case, the petitioner is arrested, the consequence of the same would be that he will be suspended by his employer. Hence, the petitioner prayed for granting anticipatory bail. [2025:RJ-JP:45352] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13153/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the anticipatory bail application and submits that investigation is still pending and the petitioner has not been co-operating in the investigation. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. It reveals from the record that prima facie evidence in the electronic form is existing to prove the conversation between the complainant and accused-petitioner and bribe was alleged to be given to co-accused at the instructions of the petitioner. 6. For the foregoing discussions and more so when investigation is still pending, without making any comments on merit, I find no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Hence, the application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner is dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /7