1 2025:CGHC:38083 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8926 of 2025 1 - Someshwar Kumar Thakur S/o Shri Banshi Lal Thakur Aged About 36 Years Post - Hostel Superintendent Class- C Per- Metric Boys Hostel Durgakondal Kanker R/o H. No. 85, Village Sankra (K) Bangla, P.O. Karhinadar, Tahsil Sanjari Balod Dsitrict - Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Department Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Block - 4 D, Ground Floor, Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector District - Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samir Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Laywer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 01/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, claiming the following reliefs:- SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.02 11:23:37 +0530 2 “10:1. that, the respondents may kindly be directed to submit the entire records as regards the petitioner's case. 10:2. that, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ or direction to the respondent to pass an order on the pending representations (Ann.- P/1) as per law within certain period. Further, may kindly direct the respondent authority to reserve one post lying vacant at district Balod, till assigning place of posting and deciding his pending representation, in view of governments policy mentioned at Clause-1.3 dated 3.6.2015 and posting policy dated 10.6.2025 mentioned at Clause-3 (3), 4 (3) and 5(3), in the interest of justice. 10:3. that, this Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to pass any order or issue any suitable writ as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit under the circumstances of the case including the cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his submission to the extent that, in the subject matter of place of posting of the petitioner, who is promoted as Hostel Superintendent (Grade-C) with respect to the place of posting, he has made his representation before the authorities concerned on 27.09.2022 & 09.06.2025, but the same has not been considered in accordance with law, and therefore, the authorities may be directed to consider the pending representation of the petitioner within the stipulated time frame. 3 3. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel and he would submit that there is no objection, if such a direction is being made to the authority concerned to decide the pending representation within the stipulated time frame, in accordance with law. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, considering the issue involved in the matter and restricted prayer made by the petitioner, the respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 1 27.09.2022 & 09.06.2025 (Annexure P/1) within 02 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, in accordance with law, on its own merits. 5. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order to the respondent No. 2 within 02 weeks from today. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika