Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3793 (RAJ)

VIKRAM SINGH S/O RADHELAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/761/2025 · 2025-02-27

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8767] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 761/2025 1. Vikram Singh S/o Radhelal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bhuaapur Gadhi, Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg. (Currently In Sub Jail, Deeg, Rajasthan). 2. Asif S/o Kadkalli, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Chhallabas Kaithwada, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (Currently In Sub Jail, Deeg, Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 871/2025 1. Sahid S/o Noordeen, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Jatoli, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Sohib @ Shoeb Akhtar S/o Noordeen, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jatoli, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 3. Rijvan S/o Kamrudeen, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ghosinga, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, Presently Resident Of Jatoli, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 27/02/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:8767] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-761/2025] 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.226/2024, registered at Police Station Khaitwada, District Deeg, for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 308(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S. and Section 66-D of I.T. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The accused- petitioners are in custody since long, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Vikram Singh S/o Radhelal, 2. Asif S/o Kadkalli, 3. Sahid S/o Noordeen, 4. Sohib @ Shoeb Akhtar S/o Noordeen and 5. Rijvan S/o Kamrudeen, in connection with FIR No.226/2024, registered at Police Station Khaitwada, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in [2025:RJ-JP:8767] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-761/2025] the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /31-32