[2025:RJ-JP:48046] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16290/2025 Sharvan Kumar Tanwar S/o Late Shri Nanu Ram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Ladnu Road, Sujangarh, District Churu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Chief Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Jaipur Rajasthan 3. Superintendent Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Circle Churu, Rajasthan. 4. Executive Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Division Sujangarh, District Churu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “1. Quashed and set aside the order No.7557- 62 dated 20-03-2023 passed by Executive Engineer, Public Health and Engineering Department, Division Sujangarh, District Churu, Rajasthan, whereby, entire past services prior to 10-04-2014 have been forfeited. 2-By way of writ, order or direction respondents may be directed to consider the entire service rendered by the petitioner for all purposes and service benefits even prior to 10- 04-2014. [2025:RJ-JP:48046] (2 of 2) [CW-16290/2025] 3-Any other appropriate order or direction may also be passed in favour of the humble petitioners.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Office is directed to reflect her name as counsel for the respondents. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/98