Mukkamula Tulasi Venkata Sirinivasa Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/32571/2018 · 2025-08-18
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37925 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37925 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010674892018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 32571/2018
Between:
1. MUKKAMULA TULASI VENKATA SIRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. SOMASHEKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O.9655, THE MAPLES CLARANCE, NEW YORK-14221, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, REP.BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY,
VEMURI VENKATA RAO, S/O.
BASVAPUNNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, D.NO.52- 1/8-1, ROAD NO.2, NTR COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT GUNTUR
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT-, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADIKONDA POLICE STATION, TADIKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. GOLI SATYANARAYANA, S/O. GOVARNDHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. LAM VILLAGE, TADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, A) To declare the inaction of the respondents in not investigating the case registered in FIR No. 194 of 2016, dated 2.12.2016, on the file of the 3rd respondent and not filing report before the competent court of law, as illegal, void, arbitrary and violating the statutory provisions engrafted to Criminal Procedure Code and law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
B) Consequently, to direct the respondents to investigate the case registered in FIR No. 194 of 2016, dated 2.12.2016, on the file of the 3rd respondent and file report before the competent court of law and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to provide police aid for implementing the decree and judgment in O.S.No.17 of 2010, dated 10.3.2016 of the, Honble Judge, Family Court-cum-XII Additional District Judge, Guntur pending disposal of the writ petition and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in IA No.1/2018 in WP No.32571/2018 dated 25.09.2018 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V R AVULA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. O MANOHER REDDY
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 32571 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the impugned Crime No.194 of 2016 was charge sheeted vide C.C.No.36 of 2018 on the file of the learned First Additional Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri and the was disposed of in Lok Adalat on 09.03.2019 itself. 3. In the light of the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, nothing remains in the present Writ Petition for further adjudication. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 19.08.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 32571 of 2018
Date: 19.08.2025 PSA