1 APHC010675532016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 42766 OF 2016 Between: 1. S.Noor Ahammad, S/o. S.Khaja Hussaini, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Attender in Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt, R.C.Nagar, Mantralayam, Kurnool District. ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3. Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt, Mantralayam-518345, Kurnool District, Rep: by its Manager. 4. Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt, Barka tpura Branch, Hyderabad, Rep: by its Manager ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Rc.No.231/SRSM/2016-17, dated 19-11-2016 transferring the petitioner from 3rd respondent mutt to 4th respondent mutt as bad, illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust, made without application of mind, against the principles of natural justice, prejudicial and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same so as to enable the petitioner to work in the respondent No.3 institution, and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:P RAJASEKHAR The Court made the following ORDER: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.42766 OF 2016 ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.S.K.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of subsequent events, the lis in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date:24.09.2025 Rns 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.42766 of 2016 Date:24.09.2025 RNS