1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18962 of 2025 Decided on: 03.12.2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rattan Lal …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 3. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner has prayed for grant of following substantive relief: “A. That the respondents No. 1 to 3 may kindly be directed to grant the pension as per the Pension Scheme under CCA CCS Pension Rules approved by the respondents No. 1 & 2 with all consequential benefits.” 2. Petitioner has claimed the above relief at the age of 69 years. The only documents appended alongwith petition are appointment and retirement orders of the petitioner. Besides these, a representation moved by the 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 petitioner on 17.12.2016 (Annexure P-3) has been appended. Para-17 of the writ petition reads as under:- “17. That the petitioner comes to know that his name was not mentioned in the CWPOA 2882 of 2020 titled as B.B. Gupta and others versus HPSCSC and others. Hence, the present petition filed for redressal of grievances as common in the aforesaid petition. Petitioner was under the impression that the aforesaid petition filed for all employees especially pre-recruit 2003 but peoples are saying that those who were the petitioner will get the benefits hence, the present petition filed.” 3. The writ petition has been filed on the basis of B.B. Gupta and others versus HPSCSC.2 However, the petition does not disclose the facts or the reliefs prayed for in B.B. Gupta.2 No documents to support the pleadings for claiming relief of pension from so called ‘Pension Fund Scheme’ have been enclosed with the petition. 4. In view of above, this writ petition cannot be entertained in its present form. Petitioner is however at liberty to file fresh petition in accordance with law after incorporating appropriate pleadings with supporting documents. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 03, 2025 Judge yogesh 2 CWPOA2882/2020