Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37915 (BOM)

RAJU LAXMAN PACCHAPURE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/1098/2016 · 2025-10-01

Sharmila U Deshmukh, Shri M S Karnik

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10-1098-2016.doc Nikita IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1098 OF 2016 Raju Laxman Pacchapure ...Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Pratik Tare i/b Mr. Sachin Mane a/w for the Petitioner. Mr. A. A. Naik, APP for the State. CORAM : M.S. KARNIK & SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2025. P.C: 1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Charge-sheet has been filed. In this view of the matter, learned Counsel seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the remedy of applying for discharge before the Trial Court. 2. It is made clear that we have not considered the contentions of the Petitioners on merits. All contentions are kept open to be raised in the application for discharge, that may be filed. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of. [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] [M.S. KARNIK, J.] 1 of 1 NIKITA KAILAS DARADE Digitally signed by NIKITA KAILAS DARADE Date: 2025.10.01 17:54:53 +0530