Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37914 (AP)

VEMPATI.VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLRC/1159/2022 · 2025-07-21

Y Lakshmana Rao

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010676072022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1159/2022 Between: VEMPATI.VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT54 YEARS BRHAMIN, S.F. 4, JAI VENKATA SAI TOWERS. PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA RURAL, NTR DISTRICT. 521108 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PILLA DURGA PRASAD, S/O VARHAL RAO 55 YEARS AUTHORIZED PERSON M/S SUN TRADING CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED, 39- 14-12, LABBIPET VIJAYAWADA ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased to allow the petition by set aside the orders dated 20-09-2022 in Crl.M.P.No.630/2020 in C.C. No 329/2019 on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of further proceedings in orders dated 20-09-2022 in Crl.M.P.No.630/2020 in C.C. No 329/2019 on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada till pending disposal of main petition in the interest of justice. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Mr. Srinivasulu P, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 22.07.2025 KAS