APHC010670002010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1987/2010 Between: K.meshak, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND G Appalaraju Kakinada And Anr Rep By P P High Court Hyd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R GOPI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision petition become infructuous in as much as the respondent No.1/ complainant is died. 2. The revision was filed by the accused/ petitioner against the order of allowing the application filed under Section 311 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for brevity Cr.P.C.), to recall P.W.1 for marking document. 2 3. In view of the death of the respondent No.1/ complainant, the revision has become infructuous. Therefore, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 24.03.2025 SCH 3 204 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1987/2010 24.03.2025 SCH