IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.18970 & 18972 of 2025 Decided on: 03.12.2025. 1. CWP No. 18970 of 2025 Gauri Prasad and others …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others .…Respondents. 2. CWP No. 18972 of 2025 Rita and others …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Ms. Menka Raj Chauha, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in both the petitions. 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representation dated 15.10.2025 (Annexure P-3, colly.) seeking applicability of Inder 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 Singh Thakur & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 03, 2025 Judge yogesh 2CWP No. 4830 of 2023, decided on 07.04.2025