Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37902 (PNJ)

SANJAY KUMAR v. MEENAKSHI

CR/1806/2025 · 2025-05-28

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 120 Sanjay Kumar Meenakshi CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) the impugned orders dated 14.11.2024 (Annexure P learned Additional District petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act titled as “S vs. Meenakshi” whereby application filed by the respondent under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for grant of interim maintenance has been allowed and the petitioner directed to pay an amount of Rs.14,000/ from the date of filing of the application alongwith Rs.25,000/ towards litigation expenses. submits that the petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the petition CR-1806-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1806 of 2025 Date of decision : Sanjay Kumar Versus Meenakshi CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Ishaan Vashisth, Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition is for quashing/setting aside the impugned orders dated 14.11.2024 (Annexure P Additional District Judge, Family Court, Chandigarh in a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act titled as “S vs. Meenakshi” whereby application filed by the respondent under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for grant of interim maintenance has been allowed and the petitioner directed to pay an amount of Rs.14,000/ from the date of filing of the application alongwith Rs.25,000/ towards litigation expenses. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the petitioner before the learned trial Court, has been 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ivil Revision No.1806 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-28.05.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ishaan Vashisth, Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Sehrawat, Advocate Prayer in the present petition is for quashing/setting aside the impugned orders dated 14.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Judge, Family Court, Chandigarh in a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act titled as “Sanjay vs. Meenakshi” whereby application filed by the respondent-wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for grant of interim maintenance has been allowed and the petitioner-husband has been directed to pay an amount of Rs.14,000/- per month as maintenance from the date of filing of the application alongwith Rs.25,000/- At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage er before the learned trial Court, has been VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.29 19.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document withdrawn by the petitioner, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. May 28, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No CR-1806-2025 (O & M) withdrawn by the petitioner, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed o , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 withdrawn by the petitioner, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.29 19.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document