Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37898 (PNJ)

SOHAN SINGH v. RURH SINGH ETC.

RSA/2023/2002 · 2025-05-01

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-2023-2002 (O&M) :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (201) RSA-2023-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision:-01.05.2025 SOHAN SINGH AND OTHERS … Appellants Versus RURH SINGH AND OTHERS ... Respondents -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present:- None for the appellants. **** ALOK JAIN , J . (Oral) 1. Main case is taken on board today itself. 2. Instant appeal has been preferred by the appellants against judgment and decree dated 25.01.2002 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib whereby the suit of the respondents/plaintiffs was partially decreed. 3. Vide order dated 24.03.2025, it was recorded that counsel for the appellants had pleaded no instructions and therefore, notice was issued to the appellants and as per office report, appellants No.1, 2 and 5 have refused to accept notice whereas appellants No.3 and 4 are reported to be died. 4. In the light of no representation on behalf of the appellants, present appeal is dismissed in default with liberty to the appellants to seek its revival only in case any cogent cause of action survives and also GAURAV SOROT 2025.05.06 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-2023-2002 (O&M) :2: alongwith appropriate application for impleading LRs on behalf of appellants No.3 and 4 within six (06) months. 5. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands also disposed of. ( ALOK JAIN ) 01.05.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2025.05.06 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document