APHC010665712013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2201/2013 Between: 1. INTI SURESH KUMAR, VIJAYAWADA, S/O. LATE SATYA DAS, RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO. 21-9/4-10, PASUPUTHOTA, DURGA NILAYAM, 5TH LANE, MADHURANAGAR, VIJAYAWADA - 11 ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REPT. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. INTI KATHCHAYANI SRIDEVI DASARI KATCHYARI SRIDEVI, W/O. SURESH KUMAR, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. C/O. D.DAYANANDAM, R/O. D.NO. 21-12-31-A, KOBBARITHOTA ROAD, MADHURANAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the order dated 22-06- 2013 passed in M.C.No. 210 of 2009 by the Hon'ble Family Court-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge Court at Vijayawada. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLRCMP 3273 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SUSPEND the operation of the order dated 22-06-2013 passed in M.C.No. 210 of 2009 by the Hon'ble Family Court-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge Court at Vijayawada, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above criminal Rc. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KIRAN TIRUMALASETTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.2201 of 2013 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite his best efforts, he could not get instructions from the party. Based on the submission made, this Court called for the report from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Krishna, directing him to secure the presence of the petitioner and the respondent No.1 who are the parties in M.C.No.210 of 2009 and record their statements. 2. Report received from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Krishna, which shows that, notice sent to both the parties were returned with an postal endorsement “no such persons in this address.” On 23.07.2025, this Court finally concluded that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case and posted the matter today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. 3. Considering the material on record, it establishes that petitioner is not pursuing the matter. Despite the best efforts made, address particulars of both the parties could not be traced out. 4. In the said facts of the case, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 29.07.2025 M K K THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.2201 of 2013 Date: 29.07.2025 M K K 118 67