Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107838 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39288 of 2008 Petitioner :- M/S Gulfam Ahmad Zubair Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Aslam Ansari,Mukhtar Alam,Sunil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Archit Mandhyan,Lakshmi Kant Mishra,Satish Mandhyan Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition inter alia with the prayer to quash the impugned orders dated 22.02.2007 and 17.05.2008 passed by respondent nos. 2 and 3 respectively. 2. After hearing counsel for the parties, the interim order was granted by this Court on 05.08.2008. 3. Following order was passed by this Court on 20.02.2025:- "1. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for time to file counter affidavit in the registry. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to deposit the remaining rent of the respondent within a period of three weeks. 3. List on 01.04.2025. 4. Interim order, if any, is extended till the next date of listing. 5. Let the amount be deposited within three weeks. " 4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, compliance affidavit filed by the petitioner in the registry. It is stated in the aforesaid affidavit that after the order passed by this Court was communicated by the petitioner by making representations before the respondent authorities, pursuant thereto an order dated 29.03.2025 was passed by the Secretary Krishni Utpadan Mandi Samiti Saharanpur by which the petitioner was directed to deposit the remaining amount of the rent as well as license renewal fee in respect of the shop No. 154C. 5. It is further stated that pursuant to the aforesaid, the petitioner has deposited the remaining amount of the rent as well as license renewal fee in respect of the shop No. 154C on 29.03.2025, copy of the receipts have been appended at page nos. 13 to 17 to the compliance affidavit. 6. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. From the perusal of record, it is clear that the decision taken against the petitioner which is under challenged in the present petition on the ground that the petitioner has not deposited certain rents, whereas the aforesaid rent has already been deposited by the petitioner. 8. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of finally directing the respondent no. 2/Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, through its Secretary Naveen Mandi Sthal, Chilkana Road, Saharanpur, District Saharanpur to pass a fresh order strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy before him but without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. 9. The order impugned will the subject to the final outcome of the decision taken by the respondent no. 2. 10. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Arti Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad