APHC010666652009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1740/2009 Between: Kanipeda Issreal, Desavaram [v], West Godavari Dist. ...PETITIONER AND The State Of A P Reptd By P P Hyderabad Anr and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DAMARAJU MADHUSUDHAN & VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S RAJA SEKHAR 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Cr.P.C’) challenging the Judgment dated 16.07.2009 passed in M.C.No.9 of 2009, on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Court, West Godavari District at Eluru. 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.1740 of 2009 Dated: 21.03.2025 2. Report from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, at Eluru, is received, whereunder it is stated as follows: “I further submit that an award was passed under Section 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 by the Hon’ble Lok Adalat Bench on 31.10.2011 in L.A.No.888/2011 in Crl.M.P.No.310 of 2011 in M.C.No.06 of 2009. In the said award respondent paid an amount of Rs.51,000/- to the petitioner towards permanent alimony and the petitioner agreed that she never claim any amount from the respondent in future.” 3. No representation for the petitioner and 2nd respondent since several adjournments. 4. The revision was filed against granting maintenance to the respondent No.2 by the learned Judge, Family Court, West Godavari District at Eluru. In view of the report submitted by the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, West Godavari District at Eluru which shows that the dispute regarding the maintenance in between the petitioner and 2nd respondent was settled in Lok Adalat held on 31.10.2011 in L.A.No.888/2011 in Crl.M.P.No.310 of 2011 in M.C.No.06 of 2009 and the petitioner herein paid an amount of Rs.51,000/- to the 2nd respondent towards permanent alimony and the 2nd respondent agreed not to claim any amount from the respondent in future, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.1740 of 2009 Dated: 21.03.2025 Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. ________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 21.03.2025 M K K