- APHC010667622022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 531 OF 2022 Appeal filed under Section 173 of M.V Act, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree passed by Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge) at Rajamahendravaram passed in M.V.O.P No. 569 of 2018 dated 30.08.2022. Between: APSRTC, Rep. by its Managing Director Vijayawada, Krishna district ...APPELLANT/2^° RESPONDENT AND 1. Patta Ravi Samuel, s/o Samuel, Aged about 46 years. Employee Resident of D.No. 58-13-06, Sanjeev Nagar Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari district (The respondent/petitioner being Dumb and Deaf Represented by his next friend and his wife Patta Sunitha) ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER 2. Kadiyapu Ramesh Babu, s/o Venkateswara Rao Aged about 44 years. Driver of APSRTC bus bearing No. AP29-Z-3781 r/o D.No. 2-59, West Ganugudem Korukonda mandal, East Godavari district ...RESPONDENT/1®^ RESPONDENT " lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay of execution of Decreepassed byMotor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge) at Rajamahendravaram passed in I ', 'i)l.^iO.P No. 569 OF 2018 dated 30.08..2022 pending disposal of the M.A.C.M.A. : SRI CH.PAVAN KUMAR REPRESENTING SRI VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (STANDING COUNSEL FOR APSRTC) Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents : The Court made the following JUDGMENT : 2 Counsel for the Appellant: 1.VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS M.A.C.M.A.No.531 of 2022 JUDGMENT: Today when the taken up, matter IS Sri Ch.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel representing on behalf of Sri Vinod Kumar Tarlada, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC- Appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal and the same was endorsed on the bundle. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- A.VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Hi SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To 1. The Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge) at Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri. Vinod Kumar Tarlada (Standing Counsel for APSRTC) Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 4. Three CD Copies Stu HIGH COURT DATED: 08/07/2025 JUDGMENT MAGMA NO. 531 OF 2022 DISMISSING THE MACMA AS WITHDRAWN