APHC010667102018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 32056/2018 Between: 1. KOLLAPALLI RAMESH, S/O. LATE RAMA JOGI, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O.THAMARPETA, NELLIMERLA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TAHSILDAR, NELLIMARLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. THE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, VIZIANAGARAM. 4. M/S NELLIMARLA JUTE MILLS COMPANY LIMITED, NELLIMARLA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ and direct the respondents direct the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith recover the gratuity amount of the petitioner as arrears of land revenue in terms of the adjudication order of the 3rd respondent in P.G.No.1 of 2009, dated 08.10.2010 for payment to the petitioner and grant Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR LABOUR (AP) 3. K MAMATA 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ...... to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ and direct the respondents direct the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith recover the gratuity amount of the petitioner as arrears of land revenue in terms of the adjudication order of the 3rd respondent in P.G.No.1 of 2009, dated 08.10.2010 for payment to the petitioner and grant ....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 32056 of 2018 02.07.2025 Mjl /*