HARSHIT SINGH CHAUHAN SON OF SHRI DALIP SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15031/2025 · 2025-10-13
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37890 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37890 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41781] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15031/2025 Harshit Singh Chauhan Son Of Shri Dalip Singh, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Chaubara, Tehsil Neemrana, District Kotputli- Behror (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Additional Director General Of Police, Recruitment And Promotion Board, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 13/10/2025
1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, requested that Your Lordship would be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and respondent may kindly be directed to conduct the written examination afresh by providing question papers in both English and Hindi medium; or in alternate Direct the respondent to award bonus marks to the petitioner for the questions which could
[2025:RJ-JP:41781] (2 of 3) [CW-15031/2025] not be attempted due to the non-availability of English medium question paper, and consider the petitioner for appointment on the post of Constable Telecommunication Operator under Advertisement dated 09.04.2025 the larger interest of justice. Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has applied for the post of Constable advertised by the respondents and when he appeared in examination it was to his surprise that medium of language was only Hindi. He submits that the petitioner was an English medium student throughout and it is desirable for the respondents to provide exam paper at least in two languages i.e. Hindi (State Language) and also in English.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
[2025:RJ-JP:41781] (3 of 3) [CW-15031/2025]
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/28