253 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-500-1998 Date of Decision: April 21, 2025 Smt. Ravi Kanta … Appellant Versus State of …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Nischal Chetanya, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) The present appeal is against concurrent findings of the Courts below. The plain&ff (appellant herein) had sought decree for mandatory injunc&on to regularize her services. A-er taking the evidence, both the Courts below have dismissed the suit. 2. It is no&ced that regulariza&on was sought on the basis of an appointment le1er issued way back in 1986. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant also submits that despite all possible efforts, he could not contact with the appellant. 4. Apart from the fact that nobody is pu9ng in appearance for the appellant, it is evident from the circumstances that cause of ac&on must have come to an end by now. 5. In view of the aforesaid, present appeal is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecu&on. April 21, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.04.22 12:10 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order