[2025:RJ-JP:45515] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13939/2025 Abdul Gani S/o Haji Ahmed Khan, Resident Of Niwasipura, Koliapada, City Hostel, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Maharashtra, Through Police Sub-Inspector, Cyber Police Station, Pune City, Maharashtra. 3. Station House Officer, Cyber Police Station, Pune City, Maharashtra. 4. Paytm Payments Bank Limited, Through Its Nodal Officer, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 12/11/2025 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “i) Direct the respondents to defreeze the petitioner’s Paytm Payments Bank Account No.919950431586, by retaining a lien only to the extent of Rs.7,720/- as per Notice dated 11.01.2024 issued by Cyber Police Station, Pune City; ii) Pass any other order/direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, including costs in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not misused his bank account for the purpose of illegal transaction and he has not committed any Cyber Crime. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the Investigating Agency. He, therefore, prays that the disputed amount i.e. Rs.7,720/-, which has been received in [2025:RJ-JP:45515] (2 of 2) [CW-13939/2025] the petitioner’s Bank Account No.919950431586 may be freezed but the amount, other than the disputed amount, may be permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner as on account of freezing of the bank account of the petitioner, he is facing problem in day to day money transactions. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent - State has not opposed the arguments made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the submissions made before this Court, it is directed to the respondent - Bank to de-freeze the Savings Bank Account No.919950431586 of the petitioner in Paytm Payments Bank. However, the disputed amount i.e. Rs.7,720/- which has been alleged to have been credited in the petitioner’s bank account in connection with fraudulent transaction shall remain freezed in the account of the petitioner and he will be allowed to operate his account aforementioned savings bank account for day to day money transactions. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner will cooperate with the Investigating Officer and he will appear before Investigating Agency as and when required. It is also ordered that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue his above mentioned bank account with the respondent - Bank till the investigation is completed by the Investigating Agency. It is also made clear that in case, after the investigation, the involvement of the petitioner is found in any illegal transaction, the Investigating Agency would be free to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. 7. With the said observations, writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J SAHIL SONI/127