HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7952/2025 Savitri W/o Shayam Singh, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Village Kankara, Tehsil Kishangarh- Bas, Police Station Kis- hangarh-Bas, District Khairthal- Tijara. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Sanju Kumari D/o Jagansingh, R/o Village Kankara, Tehsil Kishangarh-Bas, Police Station Kishangarh-Bas, District Khairthal- Tijara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/12/2025 1. The present misc. petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing of the criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 459/2015, pending against the petitioner before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh-Bas Alwar arising out of FIR No. 182/2015 registered with Police Station Kis- hangarh-Bas, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 464, 465, 420, 466, 468, 471, 473, 474, 476 and 102-B IPC, on the basis of compromise. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR No. 182/2015 was registered against the petitioner with Police Station Kishangarh-Bas-Alwar for the aforesaid offences but after investi- gation, charge-sheet was submitted against the petitioner under (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7952/2025] Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 201 IPC. At this stage, the com- plainant has submitted a compromise in favour of the petitioner and he does not wish to prosecute the petitioner. Counsel submits that the learned Magistrate vide order dated 20.03.2018 came to the conclusion that the charges under Sections 420 and 467 IPC is not made out but charges under Sections 201, 468 and 471 IPC are made out and accordingly, permission has been declined vide order dated 07.05.2022 as these offences are not compoundable. Learned counsel submit that the entire proceedings arising out of the FIR be quashed in light of the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Pun- jab and Anr. reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and Ors. reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at between the parties and looking to the fact that the parties have amicably set- tled the dispute and now the complainant does not wish to prose- cute the petitioners and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. 5. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands al- lowed. The proceedings in Criminal Case No. 459/2015, pending against the petitioner before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh-Bas Alwar arising out of FIR No. 182/2015 (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7952/2025] registered with Police Station Kishangarh-Bas, District Alwar stand quashed. 6. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/111