BABU LAL S/O SHRI CHIRANJI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/435/2025 · 2025-06-30
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3788 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3788 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23835] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 435/2025
1. Babu Lal S/o Shri Chiranji Lal, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Luniawas, P.s. Kho Nagoriyan, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajesh Meena S/o Shri Parshuram Meena, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Luniawas, P.s. Kho Nagoriyan, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Prashant Kumar Mirotha S/o Shri Nanagram Dhobi, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 6, Balaji Vihar, Near Bank Of India, Agra Road, Kanota, P.s. Kanota, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Smt. Madhu Devi Wife Of Shri Kushal Chand Jain, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of 2504, Maruji Ka Chouk, Moti Singh Bhomiya Rasta, Johri Bazar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantanu Sharma For State For Complainant : : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Sanjay Gangwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 30/06/2025 Present petition is filed under Section 528 of the BNSS for quashment of FIR No. 327/2024 dated 19.03.2024 registered at Police Station Kanota Jaipur City (East) for the offences under Sections 427, 447, 504, 379, 380 and 120B of IPC. Upon perusal of the material available on record it is noted that the petitioners have concealed the material facts qua strong criminal antecedents registered against the petitioners thereby disregarding the dictum encapsulated in the judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in Munnesh vs State of Uttar Pradesh
[2025:RJ-JP:23835] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-435/2025] registered as Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1400/2025, wherein Court has categorically directed to mandatorily disclose the criminal antecedents of the petitioners in the petition. It is further noted that an FIR was made to be registered under the directions of the learned Trial Court and thereafter the detailed investigation and appropriate proceedings were carried out. In light of the above said facts and circumstances, this Court deems it apposite to dismiss the present petition, however it is made clear that the said dismissal shall not cause any prejudice to the petitioners in the proceedings sub-judice before the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /5