IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216 RSA No.3366 of 1999 (O&M) Date of Decision :05.05.2025 Mohinder Pal Jain ......Petitioner Versus Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and another ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. A.S.Virk, Advocate for Mr. P.S.Thiara, Advocate for the respondents. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) : 1. As per the report of the Registry, notice issued to the sole appellant has been received back with the report that as stated by his son, the appellant has expired. No one has come forward to be impleaded as legal representative(s) of the appellant. It appears that the legal representative(s) of the appellant are no longer interested in pursuing the present appeal. 2. That being so, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the legal representative(s) of the appellant to move an appropriate application for revival of the appeal in case they are interested in pursuing the same. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 05.05.2025 Manoj Bhutani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.05.15 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document