BHOOMIKA RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/107675/2023 · 2025-09-25
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37876 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37876 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13322 WP No. 107675 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 107675 OF 2023 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
BHOOMIKA RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY CHIMMADI, TQ. RABHAKAVI BANAHATTI, DIST. BAGALAKOTI, R/BY THE PRESIDENT SAVITA W/O. MUTTAPPA DAWALESHWAR, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: PRESIDENT, R/O. CHIMMADI, TQ. RABHAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST. BAGALKOTI.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. B. DODDAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL AND HIGHER EDUCATION, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13322 WP No. 107675 of 2023
2.
THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF PULIC EDUCATION, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC EDUCATION, DHARWAD/BAGALKOTI.
4.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTORY, SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT, BAGALKOT.
5.
THE SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER’S OFFICE, JAMAKHANDI
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED LETTER DATED 26-07-2023 BEARING REFERENCE NO. J1/5128/KHA.PRA.SHA/SHAM.AA.KA.PRA.SHA.CHI/NE.AA/2023- 24/1173 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 5 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13322 WP No. 107675 of 2023
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 08.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SH /CT-AN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 52