PANAESHA CAPITAL PVTLTD THROUGH SANDEEP PHOGAT & ANR. v. KHUSHBU SHARMA
W.P.(C)/2065/2025 · 2025-02-18
Girish Kathpalia
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37876 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37876 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~61 to 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2063/2025 PANAESHA CAPITAL PVTLTD THROUGH SANDEEP PHOGAT & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Mudit Sood, Advocate
versus
SHAFI AZAM
.....Respondent
Through: None
+ W.P.(C) 2064/2025 PANAESHA CAPITAL PVT LTD THROUGH SANDEEP PHOGAT & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Mudit Sood, Advocate
versus
DANISH AZIM QURESHI
.....Respondent
Through: None
+ W.P.(C) 2065/2025 PANAESHA CAPITAL PVTLTD THROUGH SANDEEP PHOGAT & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Mudit Sood, Advocate
versus
KHUSHBU SHARMA
.....Respondent
Through: None
+ W.P.(C) 2066/2025 PANAESHA CAPITAL PVT LTD THROUGH DIRECTOR SANDEEP PHOGAT & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Mudit Sood, Advocate This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:38:58
versus
SHASHANK JAISWAL
.....Respondent
Through: None
+ W.P.(C) 2068/2025 PANAESHA CAPITAL PVT LTD THROUGH SANDEEP PHOGAT & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Mudit Sood, Advocate
versus
DANISH MOIN
.....Respondent
Through: None
+ W.P.(C) 2071/2025 PANAESHA CAPITAL PVT LTD THROUGH DIRECTOR SANDEEP PHOGAT & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Mudit Sood, Advocate
versus
BHAWNA
.....Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R %
18.02.2025 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM APPL. 9698/2025 & CM APPL. 9699/2025 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 2063/2025 CM APPL. 9702/2025 CM APPL. 9703/2025 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 2064/2025 CM APPL. 9706/2025 & CM APPL. 9707/2025 (exemption) in W.P.(C) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:38:58
2065/2025 CM APPL. 9710/2025 & CM APPL. 9711/2025 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 2066/2025 CM APPL. 9715/2025 & CM APPL. 9716/2025 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 2068/2025 CM APPL. 9720/2025 & CM APPL. 9721/2025 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 2071/2025
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 9700/2025 (exemption from filing the complete trial court record) in W.P.(C) 2063/2025 CM APPL. 9704/2025 (exemption from filing the complete Trial court record) in W.P.(C) 2064/2025 CM APPL. 9708/2025 (exemption from filing the complete trial court record) in W.P.(C) 2065/2025 CM APPL. 9712/2025 (exemption from filing complete Trial Court Record) in W.P.(C) 2066/2025 CM APPL. 9717/2025 (exemption from filing complete trial court record) in W.P.(C) 2068/2025 CM APPL.
9722/2025 (exemption from filing complete trial court record) in W.P.(C) 2071/2025
2. The petitioners are directed to place on record the complete trial court record within two weeks. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2063/2025 & CM APPL. 9697/2025 (stay) W.P.(C) 2064/2025 & CM APPL. 9701/2025 (stay) W.P.(C) 2065/2025 & CM APPL. 9705/2025 (stay) W.P.(C) 2066/2025 & CM APPL. 9709/2025 (stay) W.P.(C) 2068/2025 & CM APPL. 9714/2025 (stay) W.P.(C) 2071/2025 & CM APPL. 9719/2025 (stay)
3. Through these writ petitions, the petitioner management has assailed awards passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner under the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act. It appears that the petitioner management participated in the proceedings and even filed written statement but thereafter did not lead any evidence to prove the defence set up by them. In This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:38:58
the present petitions, the failure to lead defence evidence has been explained, alleging default and misconduct on the part of the erstwhile counsel. But admittedly, till date no action has been taken against the erstwhile counsel. 4. In the above backdrop, after addressing partly learned counsel for petitioner on instructions of his clients seeks permission to withdraw these six petitions with liberty to approach the execution/recovery authority with the request to allow the payments of the awarded amounts in reasonable instalments. 5. Accordingly, these petitions and accompanying applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J FEBRUARY 18, 2025/tp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:38:58